6.8是什么星座

< February 22	February 24 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

百度文化和旅游部成立，将有利于丰富旅游的文化内涵，随着市场层面的产品跟进之后，将会为广大旅游者带来文化含量更高的旅游产品和旅游环节。

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 March 8. Primefac (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Issno (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Cfd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There is a consensus to use Template:Cfd all instead of the module. Please make sure all existing functionality is kept intact before replacement and deletion. Primefac (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Cfd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary Lua module, can be implemented in Wikitext. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging participants from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 13#Template:Cfd all: @Gonnym, Trialpears, Dmehus, Tom (LT), and Kingboyk:. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just make sure all features from the modules are there first. ??Trialpears (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I concur with Trialpears. I assume we'd update the 789 transclusions to use {{Cfd all}} instead? Seems like a reasonable nomination. Doug Mehus T·C 19:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not invested in this module/template group so not going to add an official !vote to this for the moment. I will say that I believe module code to be superior to template code and that less people being able to edit Lua, does not matter in high-risk barely-edited modules. That said, Module:Cfd is badly written and not really taking advantage of the fact that its written in Lua. --Gonnym (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:California City Whiptails roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California City Whiptails roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is now defunct; roster template is no longer necessary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pozzi.c (talk ? contribs) 18:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

remaining link language wrappers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and related TfD. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a list of {{xx icon}} templates that remain following the conclusion of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 10 § Link language wrappers with under 100 transclusions. The existence of these templates is apparently the reason that Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 4 § Template:Link language is stalled.

All of this is a followup to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 9 § Link language wrappers where there was a consensus to remove usage of these wrappers but not for deletion. Monkbot/task 15 replaced almost all of the {{xx icon}} templates, their redirects, and {{link language}} and its redirects with {{in lang}}. Monkbot/task 15 continues to replace a handful of these templates daily. It is time to unstick the deletion process, delete these remaining {{xx icon}} templates, so that the {{link language}} tld can proceed, and then retire Monkbot/task 15.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my previous arguments on all 3 previous discussions. --Gonnym (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The whole "Keep the templates that used to be high use after orphaning the entire batch" thing was bogus from the start. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep Unnecessarily disrupting 8 (which is about how many task 15 edits Monkbot does a day) content creator a day by removing a feature that they have used for years is not a good idea if it can reasonably be avoided. However stalling this entire process because of it is almost as bad with it keeping duplicate category trees and templates and causing a lot of confusion. My preference can be seen at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 10#Link language wrappers with under 100 transclusions, but that doesn't seem to be gaining much traction. ??Trialpears (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete. these things need to go. [per my statements in all previous discussions] –MJL?‐Talk‐^? 17:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've just checked several, and they were all already marked {{Being deleted}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election top

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution. Primefac (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Election top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Election bottom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Practically unused set of templates (once in 2009). They should be substituted and deleted. –MJL?‐Talk‐^? 14:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Substitute and delete per nom; only 4 transclusions, so it seems this template has been superceded by another template. Doug Mehus T·C 22:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. These templates are used, even if there is no anticipated further use. Substituting would unnecessarily clutter these pages with redundant code. --Bsherr (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Replace with {{Archive top}} and delete. The current transclusions are on Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/February 2009 election . Looking at the last year article Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2019 CUOS appointments/CU, these use {{Archive top}}. --Gonnym (talk) 10:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

手脱皮吃什么药	深水炸弹什么意思	血糖高是什么引起的	嫐什么意思	老公工作劳累炖什么汤
吃地屈孕酮片有什么副作用	梦见小鬼是什么预兆	临床诊断是什么意思	月亮是什么星	月经期不能吃什么水果
吃辣拉肚子是什么原因	分泌物呈褐色是什么原因	猫不能吃什么东西	anca是什么检查	早上口干苦是什么原因
吃人肉会得什么病	无花果什么时候成熟	疱疹挂号挂什么科室	走读是什么意思	为什么会黄体功能不足

火棉胶婴儿是什么意思hcv9jop7ns3r.cn	绝育手术对女性有什么危害hcv8jop0ns2r.cn	古力娜扎全名叫什么hcv8jop7ns5r.cn	跳蚤什么样hcv8jop5ns5r.cn	减肥期间早餐应该吃什么hcv8jop9ns6r.cn
做梦梦见出车祸是什么征兆hcv9jop4ns1r.cn	市斤是什么意思hcv8jop2ns4r.cn	严重贫血的人吃什么补血最快hcv8jop8ns3r.cn	什么是白血病0297y7.com	人造珍珠是什么材质hcv8jop8ns8r.cn
茜是什么意思hcv8jop6ns9r.cn	吃什么补气虚最快最好hcv8jop0ns9r.cn	你在说什么用英语怎么说hcv9jop4ns2r.cn	虾膏是什么hcv9jop2ns8r.cn	黄疸高吃什么药hcv7jop6ns3r.cn
ards是什么病hcv8jop4ns7r.cn	什么的哲理hcv8jop0ns7r.cn	右乳导管扩张什么意思gysmod.com	冬天手脚冰凉是什么原因怎么调理hcv9jop6ns6r.cn	来月经前有褐色分泌物是什么原因tiangongnft.com

6.8是什么星座

Contents

February 23

Template:Issno

Module:Cfd

Template:California City Whiptails roster

remaining link language wrappers

Template:Election top